Dating shroud of turin

In 1532 the Shroud suffered fire damage in the chapel where it was housed.Since it was folded at the time, this resulted in a series of repetitive burn holes.John’s Cathedral, under the guardianship of the archbishop of Turin.Its authenticity has always been debated, but this has only gotten worse in recent years, and we regularly receive inquiries about it.Physical Chemistry: It is also questionable why the blood stains have remained red so long after death.Nuclear chemistry: Pro-Shroud researchers have always called the reliability of the multiple carbon dates that have been obtained from the Shroud into question.

For example, Leonardo da Vinci was known for his detailed descriptions of anatomy and the mechanical structures that he engineered.

Is it a genuine burial cloth of some unknown person, or is it just an elaborate forgery?

Is it possibly a by-product of naturally occurring chemical processes? Different groups have different stakes as to whether the Shroud is real.

Second is Thomas de Wesselow’s 2012 book by Janice Bennett, who has a Masters of Arts in Spanish literature and a certificate in advanced Biblical studies from the Catholic Biblical School of Denver.

From a somewhat skeptical position we also referenced The big question is, does the Shroud really bear the image of Jesus?

Leave a Reply